Because lots of people already were asking, I just tried out to use
irrKlang with the GCC compiler. There are always two problems when trying to use C++ binaries together produced by both compilers: ABI and name mangling. Fortunately, because irrKlang is currently only exposing very simple pure virtual COM-like classes, the ABI is not a very big problem: When manually loading the
createIrrKlangDevice()-method from irrKlang via
LoadLibrary and
GetProcAdress to circumvent the name mangling problem, you can use irrKlang 0.3 from GCC compiled programs, but this is very dangerous (I also only tried it out very shortly with a very simple example program) and still might lead to unexpected crashes.
So I recompiled the irrKlang source using GCC (surprisingly without the need to change much of the code) which I will upload in the next few days, for all the GCC users out there. Interesting is the huge difference in size of the binaries:
Even with size optimizations and stripped symbols, I don't know how GCC is able to produce that huge programs. Maybe some performance comparison would be interesting as well.
I don't care if GCC's executables are bigger... if it works.